Bibliography

WG 1

Benedetto S, Drai-Zerbib V, Pedrotti M, Tissier G, Baccino T (2013) E-Readers and Visual Fatigue. PLoS ONE 8(12): e83676. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083676 Editor:Kevin Paterson, University of Leicester, United Kingdom Received July 3, 2013; Accepted November 6, 2013

Lauterman, T. & Ackerman, R. (2014). Overcoming screen inferiority in learning and calibration. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 455-463.

Eva Lordán, Mariana Miras,Esther Nadal, Sandra Espino, Marta Minguela, Núria Castell. Is Making Written Syntheses an Aid to the  Comprehension of Documentary Sources?

WG 2

Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M.A. (2014). Learning from Multiple Documents. In Mayer, R.E. (Ed.) Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 2^nd Edition (pp. 813-841).Cambridge, MA,     Cambridge University Press.

Patricia A. Alexander & The Disciplined Reading and Learning Research Laboratory (2012): Reading Into the Future: Competence for the 21st Century, Educational Psychologist, 47:4, 259-280

Takacs, Z. K., Swart, E. K., & Bus, A. G. (2015). Benefits and Pitfalls of Multimedia and Interactive Features in Technology-Enhanced Storybooks A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 0034654314566989.

WG 3

Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Towards a neurocognitive poetics model of literary reading. Towards a cognitive neuroscience of natural language use, ed. R. Willems (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Mauss, I. B., & M. D. Robinson (2009). Measures of emotion: A review. Cognition & Emotion, 23:2, 209-237.

Oatley, K. (2012).The cognitive science of fiction. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3:4, 425–430.

WG 4

Ackerman, J. M., Nocera, C. C., & Bargh, J. A. (2010). Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science, 328: 1712-1715.

Häfner, M. (2013). When body and mind are talking: Interoception moderates embodied cognition. Experimental psychology, 60(4), 255-259.

Sparrow, B. Liu, J. & Wenger, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science 333, 776-778. DOI: 10.1126/science.1207745

Cross-WG Bibliography:

Benedetto S, Drai-Zerbib V, Pedrotti M, Tissier G, Baccino T (2013) E-Readers and Visual Fatigue. PLoS ONE 8(12): e83676. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083676 Editor:Kevin Paterson, University of Leicester, United Kingdom Received July 3, 2013; Accepted November 6, 2013

Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M.A. (2014). Learning from Multiple Documents. in Mayer, R.E. (Ed.) Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 2^nd Edition (pp. 813-841).Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press.

Mol, S. E., & J. Jolles (2014). Reading enjoyment amongst non-leisure readers can affect achievement in secondary school. Frontiers in Psychology, 5:1214, 1-10.

Davoli, C. C., Du, F., Montana, J., Garverick, S., & Abrams, R. A. (2010). When meaning matters, look but don’t touch: The effects of posture on reading. Memory & Cognition, 38(5), 555-562.

Publications by E-READ Members

• Bråten, I., Salmerón, L., Strømsø, H.I. (2016) Who said that? Investigating the Plausibility-Induced Source Focusing assumption with Norwegian undergraduate readers. Contemporary Educational Psychology 46 (2016) 253–262.
• BURKE, M., KUZMIČOVÁ, A., MANGEN, A. and SCHILHAB T. (2016) Empathy at the confluence of neuroscience and empirical literary studies. Transdisciplinary Approaches to Literature and Empathy (special issue), eds. Paul Sopčák, Massimo Salgaro and J. Berenike Herrmann. Scientific Study of Literature 6(1): 6-41.
• MANGEN, A and VAN DER WEEL, A. (2016) The evolution of reading in the age of digitisation: an integrative framework for reading research. Literacy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of United Kingdom Literacy Association.
• MANGEN, A and VAN DER WEEL, A. (2016) Why don’t we read hypertext novels? Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies
• Maceviciute, E and Nilsson, K. (2017) Books on Screens Players in the Swedish e-book market
• Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23-38.
• Arūnas Gudinavičius, Andrius Šuminas, (2018) “Choosing a book by its cover: analysis of a reader’s choice”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 74 Issue: 2, pp.430-446, https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-09-2016-0111
• Maceviciute, E., Wilson, T.D., Gudinavičius, A. & Šuminas, A. (2017). E-books in academic libraries: results of a survey carried out in Sweden and Lithuania. Information Research, 22(3), paper 762. Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/22-3/paper762.html (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6tRSbGQQR)
• Gudinavičius, A., Šuminas, A. & Maceviciute, E. (2015). E-book publishing in Lithuania: the publisher‘s perspective. Information Research, 20(2), paper 672. Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/20-2/paper672.html (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6ZG4Yq34u)
• Ebooks in Lithuania, Gudinavičius, Arūnas, Logos, 26, 19-26 (2015), DOI:https://doi.org/10.1163/1878-4712-11112060
• Zinaida Manžuch, Arūnas Gudinavičius, Andrius Šuminas, Measures for Reducing Digital Exclusion in Lithuania: Target Groups and Application Results. PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION 2018, T. 17, Nr. 1/ 2018, Vol. 17, No 1, p. 84-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.17.1.19789
• Salgaro, Massimo, Sorrentino, Pasqualina, Lauer, Gerhard, Lüdtke, Jana, and Jacobs, Arthur M. 2018. How to measure the social prestige of a Nobel Prize in Literature? Development of a scale assessing the literary value of a text, in TXT, N°5, The Book Issue, Academic Press Leiden and Amsterdam University Press, 2018, pp. 138-148